Skip to main content

🇪🇺 Europe wants investment & Ukraine to recover? My advice: remove barriers to private sector investment!

The economic recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine are rightly EU priorities. Yet precisely where private capital is most needed, we let regulatory obstacles exist.

  • 5 min to read

📉 Capital requirements for example under FRTB make it significantly harder to finance local subsidiaries and disproportionately penalize investments in non-euro countries like Ukraine.

❌ The lack of third-country equivalence for Ukraine’s banking supervision means that EU banks face higher capital charges when financing Ukrainian projects, a de facto deterrent, even in the case of sound business models and trusted local partners.

⚠️ The result: capital is not flowing where it’s most strategically needed despite geopolitical commitments and the proven resilience of Ukraine’s economy and banking sector.

What is needed now:

  • Realistic risk assessments and regulatory differentiation
  • Risk-mitigation with an EU backbone (e.g. via EIB/EBRD)
  • Third-country equivalence for Ukraine under CRR
  • Enabling, not penalizing, strategic investment

Europe needs more than political declarations, it needs the right framework to incentivize private investment. That too is part of being a geopolitically capable Union.

Related News