Skip to main content

Savings and Investment Union (SIU)

Join us in our commitment to combat financial crime and enhance the integrity of the banking system.

Savings and Investment Union (SIU)

The Savings and Investment Union (SIU) initiative represents a key milestone in strengthening Europe’s financial architecture. Its core objective is to ensure that household and institutional savings are effectively channelled into productive investments, thereby enhancing innovation, growth, and the green and digital transitions.
By deepening and harmonizing EU capital markets, the SIU has the potential to expand financing opportunities for companies—especially SMEs and startups—while providing EU citizens with broader, more diversified investment options.
To unlock these benefits, Europe must address long-standing structural barriers and coordinate reforms at both EU and Member State levels.

Challenges in the Current Framework

Several provisions in the proposed AML/CFT legislative package remain too vague. For instance, the reference to “links with family members” – thereby undermining legal certainty and a harmonised application across Member States. Others are overly broad, such as the current definition of a beneficial owner, which exceeds international best practices and FATF standards.
Moreover, the proposal does not sufficiently address key structural weaknesses of the EU AML framework:

Unequal treatment of financial products

Current frameworks often favour certain investment products over others. Structured products and certificates, despite offering distinct benefits to investors, face disadvantageous treatment compared to funds, bonds, or equities, especially regarding taxation and incentives. This can undermine investor choice and limit portfolio diversification.

Tax fragmentation

Retail investor participation, particularly cross-border, is significantly influenced by divergent national tax regimes. The EU lacks the competence to harmonize taxation directly, yet the resulting fragmentation weakens the effectiveness of capital market initiatives and deters long-term investment.

Complexity in retail investment regulation

The proposed Retail Investment Strategy risks introducing unnecessary administrative burdens without delivering tangible benefits for investors. Excessive complexity can deter participation rather than strengthen investor protection.

Bureaucratic and regulatory overlaps

Europe’s financial system remains constrained by redundant and inconsistent regulatory requirements. These inefficiencies increase compliance costs, reduce competitiveness, and inhibit innovation.

Underdeveloped and fragmented capital markets

EU capital markets lag behind global peers, limiting access to financing for startups and innovative businesses. As a result, large amounts of European capital continue to flow outside the EU—representing lost investment potential for the region’s growth and competitiveness.

Banking sector constraints and limited securitization

Europe’s banking system remains the primary source of financing but is increasingly burdened by stringent prudential requirements and fragmentation. Securitization—a vital mechanism to transfer risk and release capital—remains underutilized due to complex rules and high capital charges.

What Could Be Done More?

In essence, the Savings and Investment Union offers a historic opportunity to unlock Europe’s investment potential and boost competitiveness. Achieving this vision will require a strategic, coordinated, and simplified approach — one that empowers investors, reduces fragmentation, and relieves the financial sector from unnecessary constraints, ensuring that Europe’s savings are effectively transformed into sustainable growth.

Ensure fair and equal treatment of financial products

The EU should establish a level playing field for all instruments, ensuring that products receive equal regulatory and tax treatment.

Promote tax coordination and incentives

While direct harmonization may not be feasible, the EU should coordinate tax-related incentives through guidelines, and best practices. A harmonized approach would encourage cross-border retail investment and strengthen capital market participation.

Simplify retail investment rules

The regulations such as proposed Retail Investment Strategy should focus on simplification, clarity, and tangible investor outcomes. The aim should be to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy while maintaining transparency and proportionate safeguards.

Reduce regulatory complexity

Streamlining EU financial regulations and removing redundancies across the Capital Markets Union and Banking Union initiatives will enhance competitiveness and make compliance more efficient.

Strengthen capital markets and financial literacy

Harmonized rules on insolvency, taxation, and product regulation should be accompanied by initiatives that boost financial literacy and develop accessible savings and investment products for citizens.

Facilitate securitization and assess prudential frameworks

Simplifying due diligence requirements, recalibrating risk weights, and conducting a comprehensive review of EU banking supervision can free up capital and enhance banks’ ability to finance growth.

Encourage cooperation and stakeholder dialogue

Close alignment between EU institutions, Member States, and financial sector stakeholders is essential to design pragmatic and effective SIU measures that can be implemented successfully across the Union. 

Why Transparency Matters

The Government and Stakeholder Affairs team of the RBI Group offers in-depth expertise in the fields of banking, financial services, and economic policy. We provide sound and empirical data and facts on financial service activities in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE).

Our priority is a lively, transparent, and open information exchange with our stakeholders, whom we permanently involve in our knowledge transfer. In Vienna, in Brussels, in Europe.

Want to learn more about other initiatives?